Stephen Procter

2.5k citations
68 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Procter

66 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Stephen Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 868
  • Public Administration 276
  • Management Information Systems 277
  • Strategy and Management 425
  • Communication 103
Replace Antoinette Weibel with:
Antoinette Weibel Switzerland
Bert Spector United States
Michael I. Reed United Kingdom
Shay S. Tzafrir Israel
Philip Stiles United Kingdom
Gloria Harrell‐Cook United States
Veronica Hope Hailey United Kingdom
Nicholas Kinnie United Kingdom
Sandra Groeneveld Netherlands
William D. Todor United States
Stephen Procter relative to Antoinette Weibel Switzerland Antoinette Weibel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Antoinette Weibel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Procter. The network helps show where Stephen Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Procter Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005260
2 2009186
3 2001133
4 2007112
5 199998
6 200093
7 199866
8 200763
9 200957
10 199456
11 200849
12 201449
13 200044
14 200441
15 200839
16 201936
17 199727
18 200326
19 199924
20 201823

About Stephen Procter

Stephen Procter is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (15 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (6 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers) and Human Resource and Talent Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (868 citations), Public Administration (276 citations), Management Information Systems (277 citations), Strategy and Management (425 citations) and Communication (103 citations). Stephen Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Currie, Michael Rowlinson, Peter Clark, Charles Booth, Agnès Delahaye, Stephen Ackroyd, John Hassard, Frank Mueller, Zoe Radnor and Geert Van Hootegem. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Human Resource Management Journal, Personnel Review, International Journal of Production Economics and Organization Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact