General Health Professions

1.7M papers and 31.1M indexed citations i.

About

1.7M papers covering General Health Professions have received a total of 31.1M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Homelessness and Social Issues, Employment and Welfare Studies and Primary Care and Health Outcomes and also cover the fields of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. Some of the most active scholars covering General Health Professions are Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Alessandro Liberati, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Arnold B. Bakker, Julian P. T. Higgins and Wilmar B. Schaufeli.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about General Health Professions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering General Health Professions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering General Health Professions.

Countries where authors publish papers about General Health Professions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in General Health Professions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about General Health Professions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Health Professions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025