Personnel Review

2.3k papers and 53.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Personnel Review in the last decades have received a total of 53.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Personnel Review usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (575 papers) and Social Psychology (381 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (929 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (240 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (237 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Personnel Review are Adrian Wilkinson, Upasna A. Agarwal, John Arnold, Darwish A. Yousef, Ana Cristina Costa, Andrew Rothwell, Martin R. Edwards, Jan Selmer, Chieh‐Peng Lin and Eran Vigoda‐Gadot.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Personnel Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Personnel Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Personnel Review.

Countries where authors publish in Personnel Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Personnel Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Personnel Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Personnel Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025