Stephen Ackroyd

84 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Stephen Ackroyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Public Administration 928
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.3k
  • Management Information Systems 321
  • Health Information Management 144
  • Strategy and Management 513
Replace Bram Steijn with:
Bram Steijn Netherlands
Mick Marchington United Kingdom
Keith Townsend Australia
John Purcell United Kingdom
Ed Snape Hong Kong
Graeme Salaman United Kingdom
Eileen Appelbaum United States
Andrew Sturdy United Kingdom
Lotte Bøgh Andersen Denmark
Stephen Procter United Kingdom
Stephen Ackroyd relative to Bram Steijn Netherlands Bram Steijn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Bram Steijn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ackroyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ackroyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ackroyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ackroyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ackroyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ackroyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ackroyd. The network helps show where Stephen Ackroyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ackroyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Ackroyd Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Ackroyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995335
2 2003268
3 2007200
4 1998193
5 2005188
6 2005181
7 1996164
8 1988164
9 2006135
10
Data collection in context
1981124
11 1990123
12 2004116
13 1989108
14 200794
15 200386
16 200578
17 199574
18 200372
19 199866
20 200853

About Stephen Ackroyd

Stephen Ackroyd is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 90 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (18 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (12 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (5 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (5 papers) and Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (928 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.3k citations), Management Information Systems (321 citations), Health Information Management (144 citations) and Strategy and Management (513 citations). Stephen Ackroyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Kirkpatrick, Paul Thompson, Richard M. Walker, Paul M. Thompson, Daniel Muzio, Steve Fleetwood, Ernest R. Alexander, Gibson Burrell, John A. Hughes and Stephen Procter. Their work appears in journals such as Organization, Organization Studies, British Journal of Sociology, International Journal of Public Sector Management and Journal of Management Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact