Nikol Rummel

6.8k citations
167 papers · 3.7k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Nikol Rummel

157 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Nikol Rummel
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.3k
  • Computer Science Applications 909
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 772
  • Education 1.6k
  • Communication 272
Replace Liesbeth Kester with:
Liesbeth Kester Netherlands
Manu Kapur Switzerland
Maria Bannert Germany
John C. Nesbit Canada
Olusola Adesope United States
Allyson F. Hadwin Canada
Mitchell J. Nathan United States
Ingo Kollar Germany
Jeroen Janssen Netherlands
Rod D. Roscoe United States
Nikol Rummel relative to Liesbeth Kester Netherlands Liesbeth Kester's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Liesbeth Kester · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikol Rummel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikol Rummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikol Rummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikol Rummel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikol Rummel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikol Rummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikol Rummel. The network helps show where Nikol Rummel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nikol Rummel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikol Rummel Line = papers co-authored together Nikol Rummel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005308
2 2010259
3 2007224
4 2014182
5 2016182
6 2014138
7 2013100
8 202184
9 200879
10 201370
11 201767
12 201164
13 201463
14 201962
15 202060
16 201158
17 200957
18 201256
19 201054
20 201253

About Nikol Rummel

Nikol Rummel is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Education, Computer Science Applications and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 167 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (122 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (55 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (35 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (33 papers), Online and Blended Learning (30 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (16 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (10 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.3k citations), Computer Science Applications (909 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (772 citations), Education (1.6k citations) and Communication (272 citations). Nikol Rummel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hans Spada, Katharina Loibl, Tamara van Gog, Vincent Aleven, Erin Walker, Anne Meier, Michael Wiedmann, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Sebastian Strauß and Anouschka van Leeuwen. Their work appears in journals such as Instructional Science, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Educational Psychology Review, Learning and Instruction and International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact