Education

1.5M papers and 19.3M indexed citations i.

About

1.5M papers covering Education have received a total of 19.3M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Early Childhood Education and Development, Online and Blended Learning and Education and Critical Thinking Development and also cover the fields of Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Some of the most active scholars covering Education are Lee S. Shulman, Richard E. Mayer, Sarah E. Shannon, Linda Darling‐Hammond, Barry J. Zimmerman, Albert Bandura, Gloria Ladson‐Billings, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Kathy Charmaz and Urie Bronfenbrenner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Education.

Countries where authors publish papers about Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025