Lecture notes in computer science

6.3M citations
466.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Cryptography and Data Security
    • Logic, programming, and type systems
    • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Software top 0.01%

Papers in

    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 25.1k
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 24.9k
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 19.2k
    • Cryptography and Data Security 18.5k
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 15.7k
  • Software 21.6k

Lecture notes in computer science

417.7k papers receiving 5.8M citations

Peers

Lecture notes in computer science
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Artificial Intelligence 2.9M
  • Software 360.0k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.6M
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.0M
  • Hardware and Architecture 356.3k
Replace Communications of the ACM with:
Communications of the ACM United States
IEEE Access China
Proceedings of the IEEE United States
ACM Computing Surveys United States
Computer United States
IEEE Transactions on Computers United States
Expert Systems with Applications China
Information Sciences China
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering United States
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence United States
Lecture notes in computer science relative to Communications of the ACM United States Communications of the ACM's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.8×
Communications of the ACM · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Lecture notes in computer science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lecture notes in computer science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lecture notes in computer science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lecture notes in computer science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Lecture notes in computer science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lecture notes in computer science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lecture notes in computer science.

About Lecture notes in computer science

The 466.7k papers published in Lecture notes in computer science in the last decades have received a total of 6.3M indexed citations . Papers published in Lecture notes in computer science usually cover Artificial Intelligence (202.7k papers), Software (21.6k papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (78.8k papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (96.4k papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (93.0k papers) specifically the topics of Formal Methods in Verification (28.0k papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (25.1k papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (24.9k papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (19.2k papers), Cryptography and Data Security (18.5k papers), Data Management and Algorithms (17.2k papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (16.1k papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (15.7k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lecture notes in computer science are Thomas Brox, Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, Dan Boneh, Brent Waters, Adi Shamir, Cynthia Dwork, Mihir Bellare, Luc Van Gool and Rob Fergus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact