Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

738.5k papers and 21.9M indexed citations i.

About

738.5k papers covering Experimental and Cognitive Psychology have received a total of 21.9M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Mental Health Research Topics and Sleep and related disorders and also cover the fields of Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. Some of the most active scholars covering Experimental and Cognitive Psychology are Lenore Sawyer Radloff, Aaron T. Beck, Richard M. Ryan, Edward L. Deci, James J. Gross, Albert Bandura, Ed Diener, R. P. Snaith, A. S. Zigmond and John Sweller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Experimental and Cognitive Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental and Cognitive Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025