Michael Wiedmann

12 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Michael Wiedmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Computer Science Applications 114
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 225
  • Education 243
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 6
Replace Kathryn S. McCarthy with:
Kathryn S. McCarthy United States
Soniya Gadgil United States
Yuen-kuang Liao Taiwan
Randy Fall United States
Carolin Hahnel Germany
Pascal Wilhelm Netherlands
Rosa Maria Bottino Italy
Stephanie B. Corliss United States
Joep van der Graaf Netherlands
Stephen T. Slota
Michael Wiedmann relative to Kathryn S. McCarthy United States Kathryn S. McCarthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Kathryn S. McCarthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wiedmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wiedmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wiedmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wiedmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wiedmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wiedmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wiedmann. The network helps show where Michael Wiedmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael Wiedmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Wiedmann Line = papers co-authored together Michael Wiedmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2014177
2 201767
3 201252
4 201631
5 201621
6 202217
7 201317
8 20168
9 20198
10
Robust student knowledge: Adapting to individual student needs as they explore the concepts and practice the procedures of fractions
20157
11
Diversity, Collaboration, and Learning by Invention
20133
12
Transferring CSCL Findings to Face-to-Face Teacher Practice.
20132

About Michael Wiedmann

Michael Wiedmann is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Education, Computer Science Applications and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (5 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (114 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (225 citations), Education (243 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (6 citations). Michael Wiedmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nikol Rummel, Hans Spada, W. Holmes, Manolis Mavrikis, Beate Grawemeyer, Sergio Gutiérrez-Santos, Jennifer Wiley, Ryan C. Leach, Timo Leuders and Katharina Loibl. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Psychology Review, Computers & Education, Instructional Science, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction and Educational Technology Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact