Erin Walker

66 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Erin Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Computer Science Applications 231
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 356
  • Human-Computer Interaction 110
  • Artificial Intelligence 327
  • Applied Psychology 44
Replace H. Chad Lane with:
H. Chad Lane United States
Matthew Ventura United States
Amy Ogan United States
Blair Lehman United States
Agneta Gulz Sweden
Stephan Weibelzahl Ireland
Fathi Essalmi Tunisia
Noah L. Schroeder United States
Wolmet Barendregt Sweden
Erin Walker relative to H. Chad Lane United States H. Chad Lane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
H. Chad Lane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erin Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erin Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erin Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin Walker. The network helps show where Erin Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erin Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erin Walker Line = papers co-authored together Erin Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201370
2 201767
3 201158
4 200957
5 201440
6 201639
7 201634
8 200631
9 200928
10 201227
11 201327
12 200926
13
New challenges in CSCL: towards adaptive script support
200823
14 201521
15 202220
16 202020
17 201619
18 201717
19 200517
20 201615

About Erin Walker

Erin Walker is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Education and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 70 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (29 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (25 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (9 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (9 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), AI in Service Interactions (7 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (231 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (356 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (110 citations), Artificial Intelligence (327 citations) and Applied Psychology (44 citations). Erin Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nikol Rummel, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Heather Pon-Barry, Nichola Lubold, Winslow Burleson, Amy Ogan, Eric B. Hekler, Bruce M. McLaren, Matthew Kay and Vincent Aleven. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Journal of Latinos and Education, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning and Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact