Nick Byrd

14 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers

Nick Byrd
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Family Practice 8
  • General Decision Sciences 9
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 76
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Information Systems and Management 23
Replace Ethan Andrew Meyers with:
Ethan Andrew Meyers Canada
Tomasz Grzyb Poland
Victor N. Keller Brazil
Hiroshi Yama Japan
Noel Struchiner Brazil
Yin‐Yueh Lo Germany
Jozef Bavoľár Slovakia
Liza Zvi Israel
Kyle D. Dillon United States
Florian Wanders Netherlands
Nick Byrd relative to Ethan Andrew Meyers Canada Ethan Andrew Meyers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ethan Andrew Meyers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Byrd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Byrd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Byrd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Byrd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Byrd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Byrd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Byrd. The network helps show where Nick Byrd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Byrd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Byrd Line = papers co-authored together Nick Byrd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201945
2 202231
3 201929
4 202127
5 20238
6 20217
7 20147
8 20216
9 20254
10 20224
11 20223
12 20213
13 20222
14 20201
15 20210
16
Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences
20260
17 20250
18
Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences
20260
19 20260
20 20250

About Nick Byrd

Nick Byrd is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 177 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (8 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Information Systems and Management (23 citations). Nick Byrd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Paul Conway, Michał Białek, Miroslav Sirota, Justin Sytsma, Stephen Stich, John Schwenkler, Timo Gnambs, Theiss Bendixen, Matúš Adamkovič and Yilin Andre Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Synthese, Philosophy Compass and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact