Timo Gnambs

104 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Timo Gnambs's Hit Papers

Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality 2024 · 129 citations
1290+1Years since publication4080120

Peers

Timo Gnambs
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Applied Psychology 299
  • Social Psychology 817
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 510
  • Communication 263
  • Clinical Psychology 553
Replace Yla Tausczik with:
Yla Tausczik United States
Samuel Greiff Luxembourg
Elly A. Konijn Netherlands
Anastasia Kitsantas United States
Gábor Orosz Hungary
Chuang Wang United States
Leib Litman United States
Jonathan Robinson United States
Derek J. Koehler Canada
Jamie Guillory United States
Timo Gnambs relative to Yla Tausczik United States Yla Tausczik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Yla Tausczik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timo Gnambs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Gnambs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Gnambs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Gnambs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timo Gnambs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Gnambs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Gnambs. The network helps show where Timo Gnambs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Timo Gnambs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timo Gnambs Line = papers co-authored together Timo Gnambs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014273
2 2015205
3 2019175
4 2015169
5 2018146
6
Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality
Hit paper breakdown →
2024129
7 2012109
8 2012107
9 201898
10 201491
11 202085
12 201782
13 201873
14 201769
15 201368
16 201661
17 201055
18 201254
19 201753
20 202149

About Timo Gnambs

Timo Gnambs is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Education, having authored 111 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (23 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (11 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (9 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (8 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (299 citations), Social Psychology (817 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (510 citations), Communication (263 citations) and Clinical Psychology (553 citations). Timo Gnambs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Markus Appel, Kai Kaspar, Bernad Batinic, Ulrich Schroeders, Barbara Hanfstingl, Caroline Marker, Thomas Staufenbiel, Tobias Richter, Melanie C. Green and Gregory R. Maio. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Assessment, Computers in Human Behavior and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact