Michael Schaerer

27 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Michael Schaerer
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • General Decision Sciences 44
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 148
  • Safety Research 114
  • Social Psychology 232
  • Applied Psychology 51
Replace Caitlin M. Porter with:
Caitlin M. Porter United States
Mary C. Kern United States
Simone Moran Israel
Gregory J. Dardis United States
Noah Eisenkraft United States
Jeremy A. Yip United States
Erika Peterson United States
Ovul Sezer United States
Davide Pietroni Italy
Patrick H. Raymark United States
Michael Schaerer relative to Caitlin M. Porter United States Caitlin M. Porter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Caitlin M. Porter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schaerer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schaerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schaerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schaerer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schaerer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schaerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schaerer. The network helps show where Michael Schaerer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schaerer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Schaerer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Schaerer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201493
2 201881
3 201848
4 201447
5 202045
6 201645
7 201934
8 202331
9 201629
10 201727
11 201923
12 201723
13 201619
14 202117
15 202015
16 201814
17 202214
18 201910
19 20235
20 20165

About Michael Schaerer

Michael Schaerer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (10 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (148 citations), Safety Research (114 citations), Social Psychology (232 citations) and Applied Psychology (51 citations). Michael Schaerer has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Roderick I. Swaab, Adam D. Galinsky, Christilene du Plessis, Eric M. Anicich, Trevor Foulk, Stefan Thau, Andy J. Yap, David D. Loschelder, Richard Ronay and Jake Gale. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Psychological Science, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact