Michael Schaerer

32 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Michael Schaerer
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • General Decision Sciences 53
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 160
  • Safety Research 127
  • Social Psychology 268
Replace Charles R. Williams with:
Charles R. Williams United States
Birga Mareen Schumpe Netherlands
Daniel Sgroi United Kingdom
Carrie S. Hurst United States
Andrea Ceschi Italy
Ryan P. Jacobson United States
Tobias Wolbring Germany
Dev K. Dalal United States
Dmitry Taubinsky United States
Giovanna D’Adda Italy
Michael Schaerer relative to Charles R. Williams United States Charles R. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Charles R. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schaerer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schaerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schaerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schaerer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schaerer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schaerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schaerer. The network helps show where Michael Schaerer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schaerer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Schaerer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Schaerer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009122
2 2014106
3 201886
4 201673
5 201851
6 202048
7 201448
8 201647
9 202340
10 201938
11 202232
12 201631
13 201730
14 201728
15 201927
16 202220
17 202119
18 201619
19 202016
20 201815

About Michael Schaerer

Michael Schaerer is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (9 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (53 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (160 citations), Safety Research (127 citations) and Social Psychology (268 citations). Michael Schaerer has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Roderick Ingmar Swaab, Adam D. Galinsky, Christilene du Plessis, Eric M. Anicich, Hansruedi Siegrist, Christoph Ort, Juliane Hollender, Trevor A. Foulk, Stefan Thau and Andy J. Yap. Their work appears in journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Psychological Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact