Family Practice
Impact in
Also classified as
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 1.3k
Family Practice
11.6k papers receiving 84.9k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Family Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Family Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Family Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Family Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Family Practice
This network shows the impact of papers covering Family Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Family Practice.
About Family Practice
64.2k papers covering Family Practice have received a total of 1.4M indexed citations since 1951 . Papers on Family Practice are most often about the specific topic of Medication Adherence and Compliance, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Innovations in Medical Education, Pharmacy and Medical Practices, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Patient Safety and Medication Errors, Medical research and treatments and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics and also cover the fields of Medical Terminology, General Decision Sciences, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Health Informatics. Papers citing work on Family Practice are usually about Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Decision Sciences, Health Informatics, General Health Professions and Health Information Management. Some of the most active scholars covering Family Practice are John A. Swets, M. Robin DiMatteo, Pat Croskerry, Joyce A. Cramer, Robert Horne, Paul E. Meehl, K. Anders Ericsson, Sabina De Geest, Terrence F. Blaschke and Eduardo J. Sabate.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.