Iris Žeželj

75 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Iris Žeželj's Hit Papers

Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review 2022 · 206 citations
2060+1+2Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Iris Žeželj
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Health 200
  • Communication 135
  • Applied Psychology 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 764
  • General Decision Sciences 27
Replace Vladimíra Čavojová with:
Vladimíra Čavojová Slovakia
Jonathon McPhetres United States
Abraham M. Rutchick United States
Deborah L. Hall United States
Dustin P. Calvillo United States
Frank Renkewitz Germany
Patrick J. Leman United Kingdom
Carlee Beth Hawkins United States
Justin Hepler United States
Ljiljana B. Lazarević Serbia
Iris Žeželj relative to Vladimíra Čavojová Slovakia Vladimíra Čavojová's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Vladimíra Čavojová · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris Žeželj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Žeželj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Žeželj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Žeželj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Žeželj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Žeželj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Žeželj. The network helps show where Iris Žeželj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris Žeželj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris Žeželj Line = papers co-authored together Iris Žeželj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review
Hit paper breakdown →
2022206
2 2011129
3 2020125
4 202169
5 201257
6 202055
7 201650
8 201446
9 201944
10 201443
11 201936
12 201934
13 201734
14 202028
15 202125
16 202024
17 201720
18 201419
19 202318
20 201714

About Iris Žeželj

Iris Žeželj is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (27 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (16 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (10 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers) and Media Influence and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (200 citations), Communication (135 citations), Applied Psychology (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (764 citations) and General Decision Sciences (27 citations). Iris Žeželj has collaborated with scholars based in Serbia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jasna Milošević Đorđević, Aleksandra Lazić, Petar Lukić, Matthew Gorton, Dominique Barjolle, Zorana Zupan, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Marija Petrović, Predrag Teovanović and Jéssica Esther Machado Farias. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Social Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior, Social Psychology, BMJ Open and Appetite.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact