Freya De Keyzer

667 citations
16 papers · 457 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Freya De Keyzer

14 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Freya De Keyzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Marketing 238
  • Information Systems and Management 144
  • Sociology and Political Science 359
  • Literature and Literary Theory 49
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Naa Amponsah Dodoo with:
Naa Amponsah Dodoo United States
Leslie Cuevas United States
Jun Pang China
Joonghwa Lee United States
Eun Sook Kwon United States
Sony Kusumasondjaja Indonesia
Jung-Gyo Lee South Korea
Vlad Demsar Australia
Walter von Mettenheim Germany
Farid Tarrahi Germany
Freya De Keyzer relative to Naa Amponsah Dodoo United States Naa Amponsah Dodoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Naa Amponsah Dodoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Freya De Keyzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Freya De Keyzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freya De Keyzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freya De Keyzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Freya De Keyzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Freya De Keyzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Freya De Keyzer. The network helps show where Freya De Keyzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Freya De Keyzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Freya De Keyzer Line = papers co-authored together Freya De Keyzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2015153
2 202196
3 201733
4 202028
5 202225
6 201924
7 202321
8 201919
9 202117
10 202415
11 202312
12 20248
13 20234
14
Personalized advertising on Facebook : the role of perceived relevance, intrusiveness, information control and privacy protection
20182
15 20250
16 20260

About Freya De Keyzer

Freya De Keyzer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Information Systems and Management, Literature and Literary Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 16 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (11 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Digital Communication and Language (2 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper) and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (238 citations), Information Systems and Management (144 citations), Sociology and Political Science (359 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Freya De Keyzer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Patrick De Pelsmacker, Nathalie Dens, Cristián Buzeta, Ingrid Moons, Athanasios Polyportis and Lars Bergkvist. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Advertising, Online Information Review, Sustainability, Cleaner and Responsible Consumption and Electronic Commerce Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact