Review of Philosophy and Psychology

656 papers and 7.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 656 papers published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (418 papers), Social Psychology (196 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (194 papers) specifically the topics of Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (196 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (117 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Philosophy and Psychology are Dan Zahavi, Gerd Gigerenzer, Gary Lupyan, Celia A. Brownell, Shaun Gallagher, Donna Rose Addis, John Michael, Peter Carruthers, Richard Heersmink and Pierre Jacob.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Philosophy and Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025