John Protzko

2.2k citations
36 papers · 407 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John Protzko

32 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

John Protzko
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 149
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 119
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 64
  • General Decision Sciences 8
Replace Edoardo Alfredo Bracaglia with:
Edoardo Alfredo Bracaglia Italy
Emilio Ribes‐Iñesta Mexico
Scott A. Ottaway United States
Valérie Pennequin France
Aitao Lu China
Philip G. Erwin United Kingdom
Samantha A. Deffler United States
Shulan Jiao China
María C. D. P. Lyra Brazil
Purificación Checa Spain
John Protzko relative to Edoardo Alfredo Bracaglia Italy Edoardo Alfredo Bracaglia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.3×
Edoardo Alfredo Bracaglia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Protzko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Protzko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Protzko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Protzko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Protzko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Protzko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Protzko. The network helps show where John Protzko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Protzko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Protzko Line = papers co-authored together John Protzko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201577
2 201335
3 201629
4 201925
5 201622
6 202021
7 202219
8 201618
9 201917
10 202216
11 201715
12 201613
13 202113
14 202013
15 201710
16 202010
17 202110
18 20246
19 20216
20 20205

About John Protzko

John Protzko is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Education, having authored 36 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (149 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (119 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations) and General Decision Sciences (8 citations). John Protzko has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan W. Schooler, Joshua Aronson, Claire M. Zedelius, Clancy Blair, Roberto Colom, James M. Broadway, Jason M. Tangen, Alexander Landry, William von Hippel and Ruben Laukkonen. Their work appears in journals such as Intelligence, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, Foundations of Science and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact