Theiss Bendixen

771 citations
30 papers · 232 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Theiss Bendixen

25 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Theiss Bendixen
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 61
  • Health 39
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Information Systems and Management 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 92
Replace Jana Berkessel with:
Jana Berkessel Germany
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin Philippines
Kathleen Schmidt United States
Alice Fleerackers Canada
Christopher R. Chartier United States
Aviv J. Sharon Israel
JP Prims United States
How Hwee Ong Netherlands
Gisela Govaart Germany
Jessica Wyndham United States
Theiss Bendixen relative to Jana Berkessel Germany Jana Berkessel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jana Berkessel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Theiss Bendixen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theiss Bendixen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theiss Bendixen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theiss Bendixen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theiss Bendixen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theiss Bendixen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theiss Bendixen. The network helps show where Theiss Bendixen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theiss Bendixen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Theiss Bendixen Line = papers co-authored together Theiss Bendixen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020100
2 202223
3 202214
4 202011
5 202210
6 20209
7 20229
8 20229
9 20209
10 20237
11 20226
12
Peering into the minds of gods: What cross-cultural variation in gods’ concerns can tell us about the evolution of religion
20205
13 20224
14 20193
15 20233
16 20211
17 20241
18 20251
19 20231
20 20251

About Theiss Bendixen

Theiss Bendixen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (13 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (8 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (61 citations), Health (39 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Information Systems and Management (23 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (92 citations). Theiss Bendixen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Tom E Hardwicke, John P. A. Ioannidis, Joshua D. Wallach, Mallory C. Kidwell, Sophia Crüwell, Loukia Tzavella, Jessica Elizabeth Kosie, Robert T. Thibault and Mario Malički. Their work appears in journals such as Religion Brain & Behavior, Royal Society Open Science, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, The American Statistician and Evolution and Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact