Synthese

7.7k papers and 79.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.7k papers published in Synthese in the last decades have received a total of 79.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Synthese usually cover Philosophy (2.6k papers), History and Philosophy of Science (2.4k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (2.2k papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2.0k papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Synthese are Lotfi A. Zadeh, Kit Fine, Donald Davidson, Harry G. Frankfurt, Joseph A. Goguen, Ernst von Glasersfeld, Duncan Pritchard, David Lewis, Patrick Suppes and Carl F. Craver.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Synthese

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Synthese. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Synthese.

Countries where authors publish in Synthese

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Synthese. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Synthese with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthese more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025