Jake Gale

463 citations
7 papers · 360 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Jake Gale

6 papers receiving 352 citations

Jake Gale's Hit Papers

The Use of Online Panel Data in Management Research: A Review and Recommendations 2018 · 251 citations
2510+2+5Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Jake Gale
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 132
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Social Psychology 112
  • Marketing 32
  • Sociology and Political Science 143
Replace Hudson Sessions with:
Hudson Sessions United States
Beata Chorągwicka Spain
Mary M. Hausfeld United States
Kathryn J. L. Jacobson United States
Sandra Kiffin‐Petersen Australia
Katerina Gonzalez United States
Alessandra Lazazzara Italy
Rudolf M. Oosthuizen South Africa
Davide de Gennaro Italy
Anna C. Lennard United States
Jake Gale relative to Hudson Sessions United States Hudson Sessions's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Hudson Sessions · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Gale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Gale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Gale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Gale. The network helps show where Jake Gale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jake Gale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jake Gale Line = papers co-authored together Jake Gale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
The Use of Online Panel Data in Management Research: A Review and Recommendations
Hit paper breakdown →
2018251
2 202045
3 201844
4 202015
5 20213
6 20242
7 20200

About Jake Gale

Jake Gale is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (132 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Social Psychology (112 citations), Marketing (32 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (143 citations). Jake Gale has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Christopher O. L. H. Porter, Ryan Outlaw, Trevor Foulk, Michael Schaerer, Eric M. Anicich, Amir Erez, Pauline Schilpzand, Panagiotis Zoidis, Ivana Vranješ and Peter Bamberger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Dental Education, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Management and Academy of Management Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact