Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

293.0k citations
2.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

2.2k papers receiving 263.0k citations

Peers

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • General Decision Sciences 34.6k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 65.5k
  • Applied Psychology 28.5k
  • Information Systems and Management 28.6k
  • Safety Research 27.6k
Replace Annual Review of Psychology with:
Annual Review of Psychology United States
Psychological Bulletin United States
Journal of Consumer Research United States
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin United States
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology United States
Journal of Applied Social Psychology United States
Journal of Marketing Research United States
Administrative Science Quarterly United States
Academy of Management Journal United States
Academy of Management Review United States
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes relative to Annual Review of Psychology United States Annual Review of Psychology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Annual Review of Psychology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

About Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

The 2.3k papers published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes in the last decades have received a total of 293.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes usually cover General Decision Sciences (768 papers), Applied Psychology (322 papers), Safety Research (469 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (392 papers) and Social Psychology (632 papers) specifically the topics of Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (768 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (514 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (463 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (316 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (293 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (209 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (203 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes are Icek Ajzen, Albert Bandura, George Loewenstein, Linda Argote, Jeffrey R. Edwards, Paul Ingram, Timothy A. Judge, David A. Harrison, Margaret A. Neale and Martin Evans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact