James Arrowsmith

61 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

James Arrowsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Industrial relations 56
  • Public Administration 263
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 377
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 72
  • Safety Research 202
Replace Lutz Bellmann with:
Lutz Bellmann Germany
John Forth United Kingdom
Nicolas Bacon United Kingdom
Richard Croucher United Kingdom
Patrick Gunnigle Ireland
Craig R. Littler Australia
Kim Hoque United Kingdom
Anna Pollert United Kingdom
Huw Beynon United Kingdom
Jeff Hyman United Kingdom
James Arrowsmith relative to Lutz Bellmann Germany Lutz Bellmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Lutz Bellmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Arrowsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Arrowsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Arrowsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Arrowsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Arrowsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Arrowsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Arrowsmith. The network helps show where James Arrowsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Arrowsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Arrowsmith Line = papers co-authored together James Arrowsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001189
2 1995128
3 2003110
4 201394
5 200282
6 200469
7 201868
8 201553
9 200452
10 199949
11 200349
12 200341
13 201741
14 200240
15 199737
16 199636
17 200634
18 199329
19 200327
20 201826

About James Arrowsmith

James Arrowsmith is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Economics and Econometrics and Industrial relations, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (19 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (17 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (16 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Legal and Labor Studies (6 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers), Labor Law and Work Dynamics (4 papers) and Human Resource and Talent Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial relations (56 citations), Public Administration (263 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (377 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (72 citations) and Safety Research (202 citations). James Arrowsmith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Monder Ram, Mark W. Gilman, Paul Edwards, Jane Parker, Keith Sisson, Paul Marginson, Stuart Colin Carr, Paul Watters, Christian Yao and Huaping Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Personnel Review, Employee Relations, European Journal of Industrial Relations, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Relations industrielles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact