Chris Forde

54 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chris Forde
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Public Administration 353
  • General Health Professions 655
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 226
  • Sociology and Political Science 615
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 17
Replace James Arrowsmith with:
James Arrowsmith New Zealand
Karen M. Olsen Norway
Michael Rose United Kingdom
Caroline Lloyd United Kingdom
Janet Walsh United Kingdom
Jonathan Payne United Kingdom
Anna Pollert United Kingdom
Jeff Hyman United Kingdom
Annette Bernhardt United States
Marian Baird Australia
Chris Forde relative to James Arrowsmith New Zealand James Arrowsmith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
James Arrowsmith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Forde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Forde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Forde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Forde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Forde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Forde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Forde. The network helps show where Chris Forde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Forde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Forde Line = papers co-authored together Chris Forde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009243
2 200675
3 200572
4 201770
5 200762
6 200651
7 201650
8 202147
9 200843
10 201641
11 202240
12 200937
13 200427
14 200726
15 200925
16 201625
17 201024
18 201222
19 200816
20 201014

About Chris Forde

Chris Forde is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (38 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (31 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (7 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (5 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (353 citations), General Health Professions (655 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (226 citations), Sociology and Political Science (615 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (17 citations). Chris Forde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert MacKenzie, Gary Slater, Mark Stuart, Andy Charlwood, David A. Spencer, Andrew J. Brown, Danat Valizade, Simon Joyce, Jean Gardiner and David Spencer. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Human Resource Management Journal, Enterprise & Society, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Personnel Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact