Peter Prowse

26 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Peter Prowse
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Public Administration 79
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 213
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 17
  • Strategy and Management 93
  • Management Information Systems 55
Replace Maarten van Riemsdijk with:
Maarten van Riemsdijk Netherlands
Lynne Bennington Australia
Helen Francis United Kingdom
Seung‐Bum Yang South Korea
Birgit Benkhoff United Kingdom
Kunle Akingbola Canada
Mark E. Van Buren United States
Jean‐Marie Hiltrop Switzerland
Nils Timo Australia
James W. Thacker Canada
Peter Prowse relative to Maarten van Riemsdijk Netherlands Maarten van Riemsdijk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Maarten van Riemsdijk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Prowse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Prowse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Prowse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Prowse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Prowse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Prowse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Prowse. The network helps show where Peter Prowse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Prowse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Prowse Line = papers co-authored together Peter Prowse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007173
2 200978
3 201045
4 201527
5 200824
6 201622
7 201622
8 201516
9 200915
10 201714
11 201613
12 201612
13 199010
14 20079
15 20208
16 20067
17 20216
18 20166
19 19964
20 20214

About Peter Prowse

Peter Prowse is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (2 papers), Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs (2 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (79 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (213 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (17 citations), Strategy and Management (93 citations) and Management Information Systems (55 citations). Peter Prowse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Neeru Malhotra, Pawan Budhwar, Ray Fells, Ursula F. Ott, Helen Rogers, Jane Parker, Tony Dobbins and James Arrowsmith. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Employee Relations, Measuring Business Excellence, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management and Economic and Industrial Democracy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact