Peter Prowse

22 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Peter Prowse
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 195
  • Public Administration 66
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 14
  • Management Information Systems 51
  • Strategy and Management 79
Replace Arie Glebbeek with:
Arie Glebbeek Netherlands
Maarten van Riemsdijk Netherlands
Lynne Bennington Australia
Helen Francis United Kingdom
Seung‐Bum Yang South Korea
Birgit Benkhoff United Kingdom
Mark C. Ellickson United States
E.H. Bax Netherlands
Jean‐Marie Hiltrop Switzerland
Mark E. Van Buren United States
Peter Prowse relative to Arie Glebbeek Netherlands Arie Glebbeek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Arie Glebbeek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Prowse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Prowse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Prowse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Prowse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Prowse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Prowse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Prowse. The network helps show where Peter Prowse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Prowse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Prowse Line = papers co-authored together Peter Prowse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007167
2 200972
3 201041
4 201527
5 200824
6 201620
7 201619
8 201516
9 201712
10 201612
11 201612
12 19909
13 20078
14 20207
15 20067
16 20216
17 19964
18 20174
19 20242
20 20171

About Peter Prowse

Peter Prowse is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (8 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (195 citations), Public Administration (66 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (14 citations), Management Information Systems (51 citations) and Strategy and Management (79 citations). Peter Prowse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Neeru Malhotra, Pawan Budhwar, Ray Fells, Ursula F. Ott, Helen Rogers, James Arrowsmith, Jane Parker and Tony Dobbins. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Employee Relations, Personnel Review, Measuring Business Excellence and Negotiation and Conflict Management Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact