Jane Parker

48 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers

Jane Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Public Administration 119
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 149
  • General Health Professions 167
  • Gender Studies 66
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 9
Replace Cameron Allan with:
Cameron Allan Australia
Seung‐Bum Yang South Korea
Geoff Plimmer New Zealand
Arie Glebbeek Netherlands
Patricia Fosh United Kingdom
Patricia Findlay United Kingdom
Maeve Houlihan Ireland
Andrew O'Reilly United Kingdom
Anne Marie Cullen United Kingdom
Niall Cullinane United Kingdom
Jane Parker relative to Cameron Allan Australia Cameron Allan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Cameron Allan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Parker. The network helps show where Jane Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Parker Line = papers co-authored together Jane Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201392
2 202164
3 201544
4 201733
5 201129
6 201821
7 201620
8 201714
9 201914
10 201112
11 201811
12 201911
13 202110
14 201710
15 201610
16 20129
17 20179
18 20208
19 20138
20
Women's Groups and Equality in British Trade Unions
20038

About Jane Parker

Jane Parker is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 51 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (29 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (25 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (12 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (12 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (9 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (119 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (149 citations), General Health Professions (167 citations), Gender Studies (66 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (9 citations). Jane Parker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include James Arrowsmith, Stuart C. Carr, Paul Watters, Jarrod Haar, Mark C. Hall, John Purcell, Sue Hutchinson, Michael Terry, Darrin Hodgetts and Peter Prowse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Relations industrielles, Employee Relations, British Journal of Industrial Relations and International Labour Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact