Ray Fells

50 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Ray Fells
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Public Administration 135
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 88
  • Strategy and Management 107
  • Management Information Systems 38
  • Sociology and Political Science 179
Replace Jane Slaughter with:
Jane Slaughter United States
Thomas Pallesen Denmark
Hoyt N. Wheeler United States
Dong‐One Kim South Korea
John Gennard United Kingdom
Louise Thornthwaite Australia
Ian McAndrew New Zealand
Richard Dobbins United Kingdom
Glenville Jenkins United Kingdom
Zachary Mohr United States
Ray Fells relative to Jane Slaughter United States Jane Slaughter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Jane Slaughter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ray Fells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ray Fells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray Fells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray Fells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ray Fells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray Fells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray Fells. The network helps show where Ray Fells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ray Fells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ray Fells Line = papers co-authored together Ray Fells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199322
2 201620
3
Dynamics of industrial relations in Australia
198920
4 201619
5 199817
6 201516
7
Effective Negotiation: From Research to Results
200915
8 201712
9 198412
10 201712
11 201612
12 201612
13 201612
14 199510
15 199610
16 20179
17 19879
18 20008
19 20138
20 19858

About Ray Fells

Ray Fells is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management Information Systems and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 55 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (27 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (14 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (3 papers) and Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (135 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (88 citations), Strategy and Management (107 citations), Management Information Systems (38 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (179 citations). Ray Fells has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Prowse, Helen Rogers, Norman F. Dufty, Ursula F. Ott, Charles Mulvey, Lawson K. Savery, James Arrowsmith, Jane Parker, Andreas Pekarek and Anna Ilsøe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Employee Relations, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, Relations industrielles and Negotiation and Conflict Management Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact