Elke Sumfleth

1.6k citations
53 papers · 623 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Elke Sumfleth

44 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Elke Sumfleth
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 289
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 198
  • Education 408
  • Computer Science Applications 34
  • General Psychology 5
Replace Glenda Carter with:
Glenda Carter United States
César Delgado United States
Marianne Wiser United States
Martina Nieswandt United States
Julia D. Plummer United States
Ann Rivet United States
Sascha Bernholt Germany
Bruce Waldrip Australia
Sevil Akaygün Türkiye
Dominik Leiß Germany
Elke Sumfleth relative to Glenda Carter United States Glenda Carter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Glenda Carter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elke Sumfleth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elke Sumfleth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elke Sumfleth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elke Sumfleth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elke Sumfleth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elke Sumfleth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elke Sumfleth. The network helps show where Elke Sumfleth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elke Sumfleth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elke Sumfleth Line = papers co-authored together Elke Sumfleth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009136
2 201365
3 201859
4 201936
5 201432
6 200527
7 200823
8 198823
9 201420
10 201817
11 201115
12 201014
13 201813
14 201412
15 201411
16 200310
17 20188
18 20108
19 19808
20 20147

About Elke Sumfleth

Elke Sumfleth is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Language and Linguistics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Methods and Technologies (23 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (22 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (8 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (7 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (6 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (289 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (198 citations), Education (408 citations), Computer Science Applications (34 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Elke Sumfleth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Pakistan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Detlev Leutner, Claudia Leopold, Maik Walpuski, Sabine Fechner, Ilka Parchmann, Hans E. Fischer, Mathias Ropohl, Joachim Wirth, Matthias Brand and Keith Weber. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Science Education, Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, Educational Psychology Review, Learning and Instruction and Computers in Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact