Joachim Wirth

2.5k citations
72 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Joachim Wirth

69 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Joachim Wirth
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 583
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 283
  • Education 585
  • Computer Science Applications 97
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 171
Replace Neil Taylor with:
Neil Taylor Australia
Bill Lucas United Kingdom
Minhua Ma United Kingdom
John Woodward United States
Xiao Zhang Hong Kong
Ufuk Dilek United States
Dana Kelly United States
Edward Berger United States
Juan Zheng Canada
Xian Zhang China
Joachim Wirth relative to Neil Taylor Australia Neil Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Neil Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Wirth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Wirth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Wirth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Wirth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Wirth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Wirth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Wirth. The network helps show where Joachim Wirth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Wirth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Wirth Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Wirth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002332
2 2008118
3 200375
4 202067
5 200366
6 202065
7 200960
8 202054
9 200948
10 201643
11 200339
12 201338
13 201535
14 200934
15 201034
16 201532
17 201231
18 202230
19 200527
20 202224

About Joachim Wirth

Joachim Wirth is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (19 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (18 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (13 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (13 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (11 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (583 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (283 citations), Education (585 citations), Computer Science Applications (97 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (171 citations). Joachim Wirth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Detlev Leutner, Giovanni Grasselli, P. Egger, Ferdinand Stebner, Josef Künsting, Eckhard Klieme, Jens Fleischer, Hubertina Thillmann, Julia Waldeyer and Samuel Greiff. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, Frontiers in Psychology, Educational Psychology Review, Metacognition and Learning and European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact