Learning and Instruction

1.8k papers and 101.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Learning and Instruction in the last decades have received a total of 101.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Learning and Instruction usually cover Education (1.0k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (998 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (672 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (541 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (356 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (256 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Learning and Instruction are John Sweller, Richard E. Mayer, Stella Vosniadou, Monique Boekaerts, Shaaron Aınsworth, Andreas Krapp, Richard Lowe, David Kember, Alexander Renkl and Tamara van Gog.

In The Last Decade

Learning and Instruction

1.7k papers receiving 92.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Learning and Instruction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Learning and Instruction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Learning and Instruction.

Countries where authors publish in Learning and Instruction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Learning and Instruction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Learning and Instruction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning and Instruction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026