Na Fu

2.8k citations
81 papers · 2.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Na Fu

73 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Na Fu's Hit Papers

Bridging the gap: why, how and when HR analytics can impact organizational performance 2022 · 99 citations
990+1+2Years since publication255075

Peers

Na Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 994
  • Strategy and Management 477
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 167
  • Management Information Systems 155
  • Communication 104
Replace Robert M. Verburg with:
Robert M. Verburg Netherlands
Rune Todnem By United Kingdom
G. James Lemoine United States
Annie Pye United Kingdom
Anna Christina Bos-Nehles Netherlands
Stephen Swailes United Kingdom
Phil Johnson United Kingdom
Mark John Somers United States
Julia Connell Australia
Geert Van Hootegem Belgium
Na Fu relative to Robert M. Verburg Netherlands Robert M. Verburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Robert M. Verburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Na Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Na Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Na Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Na Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Na Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Na Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Na Fu. The network helps show where Na Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Na Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Na Fu Line = papers co-authored together Na Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015182
2 2015177
3 2015118
4 2016104
5
Bridging the gap: why, how and when HR analytics can impact organizational performance
Hit paper breakdown →
202299
6 200782
7 201780
8 200973
9 201767
10 201963
11 201356
12 201856
13 201756
14 201854
15 202152
16 202247
17 201546
18 201445
19 200845
20 201643

About Na Fu

Na Fu is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (24 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers), AI and HR Technologies (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (5 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (994 citations), Strategy and Management (477 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (167 citations), Management Information Systems (155 citations) and Communication (104 citations). Na Fu has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick C. Flood, Janine Bosak, Tim Morris, Philip O’Regan, Edel Conway, Kathy Monks, Kerstin Alfes, Catherine Bailey, Denise M. Rousseau and Qinhai Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Human Resource Management Journal, Human Resource Management, Journal of Business Ethics, Medicine and Journal of Business Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact