Julia Connell

94 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Julia Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 695
  • Public Administration 148
  • Communication 179
  • Strategy and Management 349
  • General Health Professions 390
Replace Shay S. Tzafrir with:
Shay S. Tzafrir Israel
Lynda Gratton United Kingdom
Nicholas Kinnie United Kingdom
Charlie O. Trevor United States
Gloria Harrell‐Cook United States
Angela T. Hall United States
Veronica Hope Hailey United Kingdom
Daniel J. Koys United States
Emma Parry United Kingdom
Bill Harley Australia
Julia Connell relative to Shay S. Tzafrir Israel Shay S. Tzafrir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Shay S. Tzafrir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Connell. The network helps show where Julia Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Connell Line = papers co-authored together Julia Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004178
2 2003147
3 2013100
4 200681
5 200380
6 201473
7 201354
8 201947
9 201344
10 201942
11 201341
12 201840
13 200440
14 200637
15 200733
16 201832
17 200429
18 200528
19 201728
20 200826

About Julia Connell

Julia Connell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration and Demography, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (30 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (17 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (17 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (11 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (10 papers), Higher Education and Employability (9 papers) and Digital Economy and Work Transformation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (695 citations), Public Administration (148 citations), Communication (179 citations), Strategy and Management (349 citations) and General Health Professions (390 citations). Julia Connell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include John Burgess, Natalie Ferres, Rachid Zeffane, Ranjit Voola, Suzanne Ryan, Alan Montague, Alan Nankervis, Stephen Teo, Verma Prikshat and Michael Thorpe. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Journal of Knowledge Management, Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal and Personnel Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact