Margaret Ormiston

1.6k citations
30 papers · 1.2k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Margaret Ormiston

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Margaret Ormiston
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 378
  • Marketing 224
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 239
  • Strategy and Management 349
  • Accounting 182
Replace Leda Nath with:
Leda Nath United States
Claudia A. Sacramento United Kingdom
Isaac H. Smith United States
Shimul Melwani United States
Noel Murray United States
Marko Pitesa Singapore
Robert B. Lount United States
Kimberly S. Jaussi United States
Kate Kung-McIntyre United States
Abhijeet K. Vadera United States
Margaret Ormiston relative to Leda Nath United States Leda Nath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Leda Nath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Ormiston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Ormiston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Ormiston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Ormiston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Ormiston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Ormiston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Ormiston. The network helps show where Margaret Ormiston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Margaret Ormiston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Margaret Ormiston Line = papers co-authored together Margaret Ormiston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011245
2 2011183
3 2013132
4 2015109
5 200897
6 200673
7 201668
8 201452
9 201340
10 201636
11 201029
12 202126
13 201519
14 201617
15 201916
16 20209
17 20128
18 20175
19 20224
20 20193

About Margaret Ormiston

Margaret Ormiston is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (3 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (378 citations), Marketing (224 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (239 citations), Strategy and Management (349 citations) and Accounting (182 citations). Margaret Ormiston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Elaine M. Wong, Michael P. Haselhuhn, Philip E. Tetlock, Charlan Nemeth, Charles A. O’Reilly, Jennifer A. Chatman, David F. Caldwell, David Gomulya, Warren Boeker and Amanda Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Psychological Science, The Leadership Quarterly, PLoS ONE and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact