Leda Nath

1.8k citations
15 papers · 1.2k · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Leda Nath

15 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Leda Nath's Hit Papers

Gender and Emotion in the United States: Do Men and Women Differ in Self‐Reports of Feelings and Expressive Behavior? 2004 · 503 citations
5030+7+14Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Leda Nath
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Strategy and Management 484
  • Marketing 281
  • Accounting 258
  • Social Psychology 255
  • Information Systems and Management 84
Replace Margaret E. Ormiston with:
Margaret E. Ormiston United States
John R. Sparks United States
Isaac H. Smith United States
Yeosun Yoon South Korea
Eugene S. Kim United States
David J. Gustafson United States
Ryan M. Vogel United States
Neuza Manuel Pereira Ribeiro Portugal
Liang Shao United States
Claudio Vaz Torres Brazil
Leda Nath relative to Margaret E. Ormiston United States Margaret E. Ormiston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Margaret E. Ormiston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leda Nath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leda Nath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leda Nath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leda Nath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leda Nath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leda Nath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leda Nath. The network helps show where Leda Nath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Leda Nath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leda Nath Line = papers co-authored together Leda Nath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Gender and Emotion in the United States: Do Men and Women Differ in Self‐Reports of Feelings and Expressive Behavior?
Hit paper breakdown →
2004503
2 2008454
3 200755
4 200648
5 201227
6 201226
7 201122
8 200821
9 200520
10 20147
11 20215
12 20044
13
Why Quality Matters Matters: What Students Value
20083
14
Moral Foundations Theory and the 2016 US presidential Election
20181
15 20151

About Leda Nath

Leda Nath is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (484 citations), Marketing (281 citations), Accounting (258 citations), Social Psychology (255 citations) and Information Systems and Management (84 citations). Leda Nath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robin W. Simon, Lori Holder‐Webb, David Alvra Wood, Jeffrey R. Cohen, Jennifer Glass, Michael J. Lovaglia, Jeffrey P. Cohen, Will Kalkhoff, Nicholas Pedriana and E. Elisabet Rutström. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Accounting Horizons, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Behavioral Research in Accounting and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact