Iris Howley

42 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers

Iris Howley
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Computer Science Applications 285
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 305
  • Communication 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 52
  • Artificial Intelligence 299
Replace Amy M. Johnson with:
Amy M. Johnson United States
Oliver Scheuer Germany
Erin Walker United States
François Bouchet France
Amy Soller United States
Chih‐Yueh Chou Taiwan
Carrie Demmans Epp Canada
Martin Muehlenbrock Germany
Rob Nadolski Netherlands
Reza Feyzi-Behnagh United States
Iris Howley relative to Amy M. Johnson United States Amy M. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Amy M. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris Howley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Howley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Howley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Howley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Howley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Howley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Howley. The network helps show where Iris Howley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris Howley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris Howley Line = papers co-authored together Iris Howley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015102
2 201699
3 201591
4
Forum Thread Recommendation for Massive Open Online Courses
201464
5 201356
6 200932
7 201432
8 201229
9 201328
10 201127
11
Challenges and Opportunities of Dual-Layer MOOCs: Reflections from an edX Deployment Study
201526
12 201520
13 201319
14 200517
15 201316
16 201315
17 201213
18 200813
19 202012
20 201711

About Iris Howley

Iris Howley is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Education and Communication, having authored 44 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (23 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (6 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (5 papers), Digital Communication and Language (3 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (285 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (305 citations), Communication (64 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (52 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (299 citations). Iris Howley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Penstein Rosé, Diyi Yang, Grégory Dyke, G. David Adamson, Kotaro Hayashi, Takayuki Kanda, Sherice N. Clarke, Lauren Β. Resnick, Norihiro Hagita and Masahiro Shiomi. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Journal of Learning Analytics, Learning Culture and Social Interaction and Information and Learning Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact