Information and Learning Sciences

4.5k citations
362 papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

Papers in

Information and Learning Sciences

334 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Information and Learning Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Computer Science Applications 967
  • Library and Information Sciences 208
  • Health Informatics 100
  • Education 1.8k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 699
Replace Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline with:
Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline United States
International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education United States
Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education United States
Publications United States
On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures United States
Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal United States
Journal of Interactive Media in Education United Kingdom
Journal of Information Technology Education Research United States
Active Learning in Higher Education United Kingdom
The Journal of Educators Online United States
Information and Learning Sciences relative to Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline United States Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Information and Learning Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information and Learning Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information and Learning Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information and Learning Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Information and Learning Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information and Learning Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information and Learning Sciences.

About Information and Learning Sciences

The 362 papers published in Information and Learning Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Information and Learning Sciences usually cover Library and Information Sciences (51 papers), Computer Science Applications (84 papers), Communication (58 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (82 papers) and Health Informatics (7 papers) specifically the topics of Online and Blended Learning (56 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (51 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (42 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (41 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (35 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (32 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (31 papers) and Social Media and Politics (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information and Learning Sciences are Christine Greenhow, Bruce E. Massis, Stephen J. Aguilar, Raj Kumar Bhardwaj, Sohyun Yang, Richard Allen Carter, Mary Rice, Jillianne Code, Stuti Saxena and Sarah Galvin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact