Christopher D. Nye

68 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Christopher D. Nye
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Applied Psychology 211
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 415
  • Safety Research 323
  • General Decision Sciences 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 432
Replace Brian S. Connelly with:
Brian S. Connelly United States
Dan J. Putka United States
Kevin J. Williams United States
Joachim Hüffmeier Germany
Dave Bartram United Kingdom
Chet Robie Canada
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko United States
Sarah A. Hezlett United States
Leaetta M. Hough United States
Steven E. Scullen United States
Christopher D. Nye relative to Brian S. Connelly United States Brian S. Connelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Brian S. Connelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher D. Nye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher D. Nye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher D. Nye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher D. Nye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher D. Nye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher D. Nye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher D. Nye. The network helps show where Christopher D. Nye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher D. Nye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher D. Nye Line = papers co-authored together Christopher D. Nye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012241
2 2010166
3 2011147
4 2016125
5 201898
6 201075
7 201673
8 201872
9 200866
10 201465
11 201052
12 201938
13 202136
14 200836
15 202233
16 201131
17 201531
18 201730
19 202127
20 202026

About Christopher D. Nye

Christopher D. Nye is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Career Development and Diversity (13 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (12 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (9 papers), Higher Education and Employability (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (211 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (415 citations), Safety Research (323 citations), General Decision Sciences (65 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (432 citations). Christopher D. Nye has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and China. Frequent co-authors include Fritz Drasgow, James Rounds, Rong Su, Scott Highhouse, Don C. Zhang, Joshua J. Prasad, Gerard Saucier, Jacob Bradburn, Stephen Stark and Brent W. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Military Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Organizational Research Methods, International Journal of Selection and Assessment and Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact