Military Psychology

1.1k papers and 15.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Military Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 15.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Military Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (445 papers), Social Psychology (355 papers) and General Health Professions (196 papers) specifically the topics of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (274 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (144 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Military Psychology are Paul T. Bartone, James Griffith, Fritz Drasgow, Michael D. Matthews, Louise F. Fitzgerald, Amy B. Adler, Vicki J. Magley, Dawne Vogt, Salvatore R. Maddi and Thomas W. Britt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Military Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Military Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Military Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Military Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Military Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Military Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Military Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025