Cognitive Psychology

1.2k papers and 198.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Cognitive Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 198.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (615 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (587 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (376 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Animal Learning Development (351 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (181 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (176 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Psychology are Amos Tversky, Anne Treisman, Daniel Kahneman, Garry A. Gelade, Eleanor Rosch, David Navon, Herbert A. Simon, Keith J. Holyoak, Carolyn Β. Mervis and Alexander Witzki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025