Beth Polin

562 citations
14 papers · 372 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Polin

13 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Beth Polin
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 126
  • Social Psychology 101
  • Communication 33
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 27
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 3
Replace Julia A. M. Reif with:
Julia A. M. Reif Germany
Amir Riaz Pakistan
Daniela C. Wilks Portugal
Piotr Kwiatek Kuwait
Katherine A. Frear United States
Constance Campbell United States
Alessandra Lazazzara Italy
David S. DeGeest United States
Changqing He China
C. Justice Tillman United States
Beth Polin relative to Julia A. M. Reif Germany Julia A. M. Reif's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Julia A. M. Reif · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Polin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Polin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Polin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Polin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Polin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Polin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Polin. The network helps show where Beth Polin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Beth Polin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Polin Line = papers co-authored together Beth Polin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201694
2 201590
3 201254
4 202138
5 201527
6 201317
7 201316
8 201216
9 20148
10 20236
11 20182
12 20172
13 20122
14
Putting the Power Back Into Empowerment: Construct Clarification and the Incorporation of Trust
20130

About Beth Polin

Beth Polin is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (4 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (126 citations), Social Psychology (101 citations), Communication (33 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (27 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (3 citations). Beth Polin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Roy J. Lewicki, Howard J. Klein, Robert B. Lount, Jeffrey D. Ford, Laurie W. Ford, Alison M. Dachner, Sarah Doyle, Barbara Gray, Nitya Chawla and Bruce Barry. Their work appears in journals such as Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, International Journal of Selection and Assessment and Journal of Change Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact