Journal of Change Management

527 papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 527 papers published in Journal of Change Management in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Change Management usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (326 papers), Strategy and Management (127 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (89 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (192 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (105 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Change Management are Rune Todnem By, Bernard Burnes, Rune Lines, Malcolm Higgs, Roger Gill, Achilles A. Armenakis, Deborah Rowland, Pedro Neves, Mark Hughes and Anthony M. Grant.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Change Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Change Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Change Management.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Change Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Change Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Change Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Change Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025