Bernardo Prieto
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 1%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Food Science top 2%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Food Safety and Hygiene
Papers in
- Food Science 23
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 18
- Proteins in Food Systems 6
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 2
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 18
- Co-authors
- Javier Carballo (24 shared papers)Inmaculada Franco (17 shared papers)J.M. Fresno (14 shared papers)Ana Bernardo (5 shared papers)Josefa González Prieto (4 shared papers)M.E. Tornadijo (8 shared papers)María C. García Fontán (4 shared papers)Mercedes López (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Bernardo Prieto
31 papers receiving 646 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Animal Science and Zoology 397
- Food Science 493
- Biotechnology 78
- Nutrition and Dietetics 100
- Molecular Biology 304
Countries citing papers authored by Bernardo Prieto
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernardo Prieto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernardo Prieto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernardo Prieto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernardo Prieto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernardo Prieto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernardo Prieto. The network helps show where Bernardo Prieto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bernardo Prieto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 14 |
About Bernardo Prieto
Bernardo Prieto is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Biotechnology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (18 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (18 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (13 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (6 papers), Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (397 citations), Food Science (493 citations), Biotechnology (78 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (100 citations) and Molecular Biology (304 citations). Bernardo Prieto has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Javier Carballo, Inmaculada Franco, J.M. Fresno, Ana Bernardo, Josefa González Prieto, M.E. Tornadijo, María C. García Fontán, Mercedes López, J.M. Cruz and Ana C. Freitas. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, International Dairy Journal, International Journal of Dairy Technology and Microbiome.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.