Molecular Biology

7.7M papers and 271.4M indexed citations i.

About

7.7M papers covering Molecular Biology have received a total of 271.4M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling and also cover the fields of Plant Science, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Plant Science, Genetics and Oncology. Some of the most active scholars covering Molecular Biology are Ulrich K. Laemmli, Mark A. Bradford, Kenneth J. Livak, Thomas D. Schmittgen, Stephen F. Altschul, George M. Sheldrick, A. Farr, R. C. Edgar, Koichiro Tamura and Nicoletta Sacchi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Molecular Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Molecular Biology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Molecular Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Molecular Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025