Remedial and Special Education

1.5k papers and 46.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Remedial and Special Education in the last decades have received a total of 46.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Remedial and Special Education usually cover Education (830 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (767 papers) and Safety Research (454 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (430 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (392 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (288 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Remedial and Special Education are William E. Tunmer, Philip B. Gough, Thomas E. Scruggs, Margo A. Mastropieri, William J. Therrien, Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Lorna Idol, Sharon Vaughn and Glendon Casto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Remedial and Special Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Remedial and Special Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Remedial and Special Education.

Countries where authors publish in Remedial and Special Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Remedial and Special Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Remedial and Special Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Remedial and Special Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025