Countries where authors publish in School Psychology Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in School Psychology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in School Psychology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites School Psychology Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in School Psychology Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in School Psychology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in School Psychology Review.
About School Psychology Review
The 2.3k papers published in School Psychology Review in the last decades have received a total of 81.8k indexed citations . Papers published in School Psychology Review usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k papers), General Psychology (77 papers), Clinical Psychology (969 papers), Education (886 papers) and Social Psychology (532 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (762 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (712 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (465 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (402 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (279 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (231 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (216 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (195 papers). The most active scholars publishing in School Psychology Review are Frank M. Gresham, Lynn S. Fuchs, Dorothy L. Espelage, Robert C. Pianta, Daniel J. Reschly, Thomas R. Kratochwill, George J. DuPaul, Susan M. Swearer, Mark R. Shinn and Megan Stuhlman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.