School Psychology Review

2.2k papers and 63.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in School Psychology Review in the last decades have received a total of 63.5k indexed citations. Papers published in School Psychology Review usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k papers), Clinical Psychology (948 papers) and Education (859 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (750 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (699 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (462 papers). The most active scholars publishing in School Psychology Review are Frank M. Gresham, Lynn S. Fuchs, Dorothy L. Espelage, Robert C. Pianta, Daniel J. Reschly, George J. DuPaul, Susan M. Swearer, Mark R. Shinn, Thomas R. Kratochwill and Megan Stuhlman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in School Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in School Psychology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in School Psychology Review.

Countries where authors publish in School Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in School Psychology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in School Psychology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites School Psychology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025