Exceptional Children

3.2k papers and 88.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Exceptional Children in the last decades have received a total of 88.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Exceptional Children usually cover Education (1.2k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.1k papers) and Clinical Psychology (677 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (528 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (505 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (414 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Exceptional Children are Stanley L. Deno, Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Samuel L. Odom, Lloyd M. Dunn, Margo A. Mastropieri, Russell Gersten, Robert H. Horner, Andrew S. Halpern and Thomas E. Scruggs.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Exceptional Children

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Exceptional Children. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Exceptional Children.

Countries where authors publish in Exceptional Children

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Exceptional Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Exceptional Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exceptional Children more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025