Stephen Deery

54 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Stephen Deery
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Public Administration 564
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 841
  • General Health Professions 647
  • Gender Studies 161
  • Sociology and Political Science 697
Replace Daniel G. Gallagher with:
Daniel G. Gallagher United States
Janet Walsh United Kingdom
Ian Kessler United Kingdom
Paul Blyton United Kingdom
Sue Hutchinson United Kingdom
Peter Bain United Kingdom
John W. Budd United States
David Giauque Switzerland
Kim Hoque United Kingdom
Michàlle E. Mor Barak United States
Stephen Deery relative to Daniel G. Gallagher United States Daniel G. Gallagher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Daniel G. Gallagher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Deery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Deery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Deery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Deery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Deery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Deery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Deery. The network helps show where Stephen Deery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Deery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Deery Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Deery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006224
2 2011113
3 200595
4
Australia at Work: Just Managing?
200093
5 199984
6 200279
7 200178
8 201677
9 198277
10 201476
11 199475
12 201771
13 199451
14 200950
15 201950
16 199943
17 200943
18
Industrial relations: A contemporary analysis
200142
19 199141
20 200833

About Stephen Deery

Stephen Deery is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (29 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (19 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (13 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (7 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (6 papers), Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (564 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (841 citations), General Health Professions (647 citations), Gender Studies (161 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (697 citations). Stephen Deery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roderick D. Iverson, Janet Walsh, Nicholas Kinnie, Peter Erwin, Christopher D. Zatzick, David Guest, Donna Maree Buttigieg, Helen De Cieri, Bruce A. Rayton and Clifford B. Donn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Journal of Applied Psychology, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact