Scott Grant

38 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

Scott Grant
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Human-Computer Interaction 126
  • Software 68
  • Computer Science Applications 77
  • Language and Linguistics 115
  • Information Systems 240
Replace Yam San Chee with:
Yam San Chee Singapore
Brian M. Slator United States
Paul Brna United Kingdom
Si Na Kew Malaysia
Jirarat Sitthiworachart Thailand
Stephanie Ludi United States
Maria Kordaki Greece
Manuel Palomo‐Duarte Spain
Oliver Scheuer Germany
Rob Nadolski Netherlands
Scott Grant relative to Yam San Chee Singapore Yam San Chee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Yam San Chee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Grant. The network helps show where Scott Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Grant Line = papers co-authored together Scott Grant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201383
2 201045
3
Language acquisition in second life: improving self-efficacybeliefs
200942
4 201341
5 201239
6 200833
7 201329
8 201524
9 200923
10 201422
11 201421
12 202020
13 201518
14
The integration of an online 3D virtual learning environment into formal classroom-based undergraduate Chinese language and culture curriculum
201015
15 201113
16 201213
17 202110
18 201110
19 20159
20
Topic Detection Using Independent Component Analysis
20079

About Scott Grant

Scott Grant is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Information Systems, Education, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (9 papers), Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (126 citations), Software (68 citations), Computer Science Applications (77 citations), Language and Linguistics (115 citations) and Information Systems (240 citations). Scott Grant has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include James R. Cordy, Hui Huang, David B. Skillicorn, Sarah Pasfield‐Neofitou, Michael Henderson, Yu‐Ju Lan, Lyn Henderson, Rosemary Clerehan, Nian‐Shing Chen and Ping Li. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Technology Research and Development, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Science of Computer Programming, British Journal of Educational Technology and Language Learning Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact