Mark Pegrum

84 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Mark Pegrum
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Computer Science Applications 167
  • Information Systems 682
  • Education 841
  • Literature and Literary Theory 276
  • Language and Linguistics 227
Replace Nicky Hockly with:
Nicky Hockly United States
Jeong‐Bae Son Australia
Joan E. Hughes United States
Bryan Alexander United States
Daniel Churchill Hong Kong
David Reinking United States
Shiang‐Kwei Wang United States
Ron Owston Canada
Michael Thomas United Kingdom
Kyle L. Peck United States
Mark Pegrum relative to Nicky Hockly United States Nicky Hockly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Nicky Hockly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pegrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pegrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pegrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pegrum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pegrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pegrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pegrum. The network helps show where Mark Pegrum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pegrum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pegrum Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pegrum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013177
2
Digital Literacies
2013118
3 2014114
4
Mobile Learning: Languages, Literacies and Cultures
201497
5 201388
6 201383
7
From Blogs to Bombs: The Future of Digital Technologies in Education
200981
8 201467
9 201856
10 201552
11 200849
12 201644
13 201339
14 201835
15 201433
16 201932
17 201728
18 202226
19 201125
20 201024

About Mark Pegrum

Mark Pegrum is a scholar working on Information Systems, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Learning in Education (25 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (11 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (7 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (167 citations), Information Systems (682 citations), Education (841 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (276 citations) and Language and Linguistics (227 citations). Mark Pegrum has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Grace Oakley, Gavin Dudeney, Nicky Hockly, Robert Faulkner, Christine Howitt, Michelle Striepe, Nancy Longnecker, Emma Bartle, Hayo Reinders and Martin Forsey. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, International Journal of Management in Education, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Language learning & technology and Interactive Technology and Smart Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact