Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

9.1k citations
443 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

369 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Computer Science Applications 2.6k
  • Health Informatics 371
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.5k
  • Education 3.8k
  • Information Systems 2.5k
Replace Contemporary Educational Technology with:
Contemporary Educational Technology Türkiye
Interactive Technology and Smart Education United Kingdom
Journal of Learning Analytics United States
Journal of Computers in Education China
Smart Learning Environments United States
The Journal of Interactive Learning Research United States
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology United States
Journal of Information Technology Education Research United States
International Journal of STEM Education United States
ACM Transactions on Computing Education United States
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning relative to Contemporary Educational Technology Türkiye Contemporary Educational Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Contemporary Educational Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning.

About Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

The 443 papers published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning usually cover Computer Science Applications (117 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (181 papers), Education (185 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 papers) and Information Systems (92 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (133 papers), Online and Blended Learning (75 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (72 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (47 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (40 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (38 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (25 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning are Sharon Kerr, Ştefan Popenici, Khe Foon Hew, Chung Kwan Lo, Jeremy Roschelle, Ben Kei Daniel, Helen Owen, Sherlock A. Licorish, William R. Penuel and Nicole Shechtman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact